Hiển thị các bài đăng có nhãn levelFILM. Hiển thị tất cả bài đăng
Hiển thị các bài đăng có nhãn levelFILM. Hiển thị tất cả bài đăng

Thứ Năm, 13 tháng 11, 2014

THE BETTER ANGELS - Review By Greg Klymkiw - Malick protege's gorgeous rural period piece





1817.
Indiana.
Log cabin.

Deep woods.
A boy's love

for his mother.
The Better Angels (2014)
Dir. A.J. Edwards
Starring: Jason Clarke, Diane Kruger, Brit Marling, Braydon Denney

Review By Greg Klymkiw

In life and even after death, our real angels are indeed, as the title of this great film tells us, The Better Angels.

Fading up from a pitch black silent screen, one simple, powerful quotation from President Abraham Lincoln, tells us, and in retrospect, corroborates that this is the very core and essence of the dazzling directorial debut of Terrence Malick's longtime editor A.J. Edwards. It reads:
"All that I am, or hope to be, I owe to my angel mother."
As the text fades down, we're left with a silent black screen for a few moments until a stately, ravishingly composed and arranged orchestral score envelopes us in the dark. Once the piece ends, we're greeted by harsh monochrome light attempting to break through an overcast sky and resting upon a set of steps that lead upwards to a series of majestic columns.

Moving inside and beyond this brief exterior shot, we're treated to a series of images by a camera aimed along the massive columns as they try to reach beyond the ceiling to be nourished by the light of the heavens. We get a brief glimpse of a bronze plaque embedded into the back wall and try as we might, it's impossible to make out what the words represent since the camera turns itself around as if from the point of view of these words, the plaque flanked by sculpted doves.

From within the darkness of this perspective we finally get a glimpse of the light pouring through the massive columns as the voice of an old man asks, "You wondering what kind of boy he was?" And then, we're gloriously winded by a smash cut to a river at dusk, the still water defined on either side by banks of majestic trees casting dark shadows upon the shimmering beauty, at once beautiful and alternately not unlike a visual representative of a lamentation for a time long passed.

This transition from the cold stone under grey light, representing something long dead, but worthy of the sort of worship its architecture demands, to the stunning beauty of the natural world is not only cinematically powerful, but in fact, is part of the film's overall style and storytelling techniques which, far exceed the cerebral pretence of Edwards' mentor, colleague and producer of this film. Terrence Malick's Tree of Life and To The Wonder were both such ludicrous wanks that it's kind of cool seeing the wankier inspirations being transformed into simple, emotional storytelling.

Our narrator gives us few details about "the boy", but then, we don't need too much more than what we actually see ourselves. What we do see is delivered in the measured pace of rural existence and though there are many Malick-like bits of cerebral looking-up-at-trees and so forth, it's all rooted in character and narrative (albeit a smidgen off the regular beaten path) in addition to the film's extraordinary tone.

The picture is ultimately so gorgeous, so inspiring and often heart-wrenching that this story about a little boy growing up in a little log cabin in Indiana in 1817 is compulsively watchable.

We learn from our narrator that the lad's name is Abe (Braydon Denney) and that he'll eventually leave home at the age of 21. It wouldn't take an Albert Einstein to figure out we're in on the childhood of Honest Abe Lincoln himself, but I suspect if I hadn't known before going in that this is whom/what the picture was dealing with, I'd like to think I'd have potentially been watching the story of a young boy, any young boy and his deep, undying love for his mother.

I will say, though, that the images and events rendered by Edwards and his cinematographer Matthew J. Lloyd, all underscored by a gorgeous soundtrack composed by Hunan Townshend, are ultimately so potent that I did indeed file away my knowledge that we were following the young boy who eventually became one of the great presidents of the United States of America. What's kind of cool about this is that we're left with an evocative portrait of pioneer life that gives us a sense of both the hardships and joys of working the land and being inextricably linked to it.

The narrative of Abe's younger years is presented in a series of impressions of days and nights that proceed over the course of time and we're moved forward by some of the most spectacular jump cuts rendered in any film in recent memory. Though some cuts are clearly of the breathtaking variety, many seem so perfectly fluid and in fact seem as gentle as required, when required. We get impressions of children at play and at work, but we're almost always within Abe's sphere and/or POV. Ultimately, the film focuses upon a simple trinity of characters overwhelming all others populating the frame. The most important relationships involve Abe and his stern father (Jason Clarke) and his truly angelic mother (Diane Kruger).

When Abe raises the ire of his father and gets a stern lecture and/or a painful whipping, it's of course his mother who applies the gentle words to calm Abe and to help him understand and love his father in spite of the punishment. One of the most moving sequences is when Abe's mother tenderly describes the look on her husband's face when he first laid eyes on the boy after birth. She assures him that his father had nothing but adoration in his eyes and that she knew that he would always go to the wall for Abe and protect him with his very life.

We do indeed experience moments of tenderness between Abe and his Dad. We also come to understand that it's Abe's mother who recognizes the boy's special gifts and tries to convince her husband that Abe's not cut out for the rough, brutal hardships of working the land. Dad seems at first to dismiss this out of spite or even jealousy, but as the film progresses, we see that Abe's Dad wants to build fortitude and perseverance in his son.

When Abe's mother is taken ill and dies, Abe's Dad marries anew and Abe's stepmother (Brit Marling) proves to be as angelic, if not even more spiritually connected to the boy. The trinity of Father, Son and Stepmother is also as strong and important as the first one.

In both cases, it is the MOTHER (by blood and by marriage) who is able to outwardly perceive Abe's intelligence and sensitivity, whilst Dad is the hide toughener. One sequence even has a dreamy, ghostly moment when both mothers connect fleetingly and we are infused with an almost spiritual warmth, a glow that carries us and Abe through whatever hardships he continues to face.

And as haunting and sad as many of the impressions Edwards imparts are, we're always tied to the glory and spirit of the natural world and the special love that only a mother and son can have. The film paints a portrait of the formative years of a great man, but what we're often aware of is the potential of greatness in any man who honours God, nature and of course, his mother.

THE FILM CORNER RATING: **** 4 Stars

The Better Angels is in platform theatrical release via levelFILM and can be seen in Toronto at the Carlton Cinema. Why this isn't also unspooling at TIFF Bell Lightbox and/or a decent Cineplex screen is beyond me. It's worth seeing as soon as possible, but I suspect its astounding picture and sound will shine ever-beautifully once the film is released on Blu-Ray.

PLEASE FEEL FREE TO ORDER ANYTHING FROM AMAZON BY USING THE LINKS BELOW. CLICKING ON THEM AND THEN CLICKING THROUGH TO ANYTHING WILL ALLOW YOU TO ORDER AND IN SO DOING, SUPPORT THE ONGING MAINTENANCE OF THE FILM CORNER.

AMAZON.CA



AMAZON.COM



AMAZON.UK


Thứ Ba, 7 tháng 10, 2014

DIRTY WEEKEND - Review By Greg Klymkiw - Crime-triple-hander not just lame, but legless.

The movie is as good as its poster.
Dirty Weekend (2013)
Dir. Christopher Granier-Deferre
Starring: Kirsty Oswald, Jamie Parker, Pierre Perrier, Bernard Blancan, Didier Vinson

Review By Greg Klymkiw

A singularly unattractive British couple (Kirsty Oswald, Jamie Parker) - not just skin-deep ugliness, either - have their weekend of illicit amore in a country cottage in France scuttled by the appearance of a murderous scumbag (Pierre Perrier) who's in possession of a whack of stolen gold coins. The couple sees dollar signs in their eyes and a drawn-out cat and mouse game ensues, replete with a surfeit of poorly-scribed (by Geoffrey Gunn) yakking, familiar story tropes and clumsily-wrought "suspense".

The only respite from this plodding mediocrity is the appearance of two seemingly bumbling gendarmes (Bernard Blancan, Didier Vinson) who bring some wit to the proceedings. The performances of the leads are imbued with competence, but the characters give them little to do but try to breathe life into ever-so familiar stick figures.

This dreadfully inconsequent film might play for bleary-eyed viewers with little taste in the middle of the night on VOD. The rest of us, should probably cut our toenails instead.

THE FILM CORNER RATING:
*½ One-and-a-half-stars


levelFILM will release Dirty Weekend on VOD & digital in Canada & the USA on October 14, 2014.

Chủ Nhật, 18 tháng 5, 2014

A BIRDER'S GUIDE TO EVERYTHING - Review By Greg Klymkiw - Coming-of-age family film is as sweet as honey.

Unbelievably sweet coming-of-age picture and official selection at the TIFF 2014 Next Wave Film Festival is great entertainment for the whole family and now available on DVD from levelFilm. A definite keeper.

David, Timmy and Ellen are looking for an extinct duck.
Will they find it? We sure hope so. For their sake.

Is that Sir Ben Kingsley?
By Jove! I think it is!
A Birder's Guide To Everything (2013) ***
Dir. Rob Meyer / Script: Luke Matheny, Rob Meyer
Starring: Kodi Smit-McPhee, Ben Kingsley, Alex Wolff, Katie Chang, Michael Chen, James LeGros, Tracy Bundy, Daniela Lavender

Review By Greg Klymkiw

It's bad enough that David (Kodi Smit-McPhee), Timmy (Alex Wolff) and Peter (Michael Chen) are geeks, but because they've lost the fourth member of their club, they might lose official club status at their school. This would be a big problem since they're such mega-geeks that this would be an incredible embarrassment. Not only are they geeks, but their club epitomizes geek-dom of the highest order as it's devoted to birding, an activity which seals the deal on their geek-ish status amongst their peers. If only they could accomplish something that would somehow make them and their club super-cool. As luck would have it, an opportunity does indeed present itself. When David spots a rare duck - so rare it's thought to have been extinct for several decades - he presents his findings to the lads. Alas, he was on his bike when he saw it, so the photograph he attempted to take would, in the world of birding, be too inconclusive to prove the find. With the help of Lawrence (Ben Kingsley), a world famous birder who conveniently lives in their town, they're given some solid information as to how and where to track it down. Conveniently, Lawrence knew and respected David's Mom (Tracy Bundy), a famous birder whom we meet over the course of a few flashbacks.

David, of course, acquired his skills and interest in birding via his Loving Mom, but as she's been dead for over a year, Lawrence seems quicker with the information than he normally would be. Birders are craftily competitive with each other and normally Sir Ben's character would have kept mum and just gone after the rare bird himself. Sympathy saves the day though and soon, with Lawrence's sage advice, the lads have a realistic goal.

There are, however, a few roadblocks in their way. David's Dad (James LeGros) is getting married just when the boys need to track their quarry. David is bitter that his Father is marrying his six-feet-under-Mom's private nurse (Daniela Lavender) and he must seriously consider hurting Dad's feelings and skipping the nuptials altogether. Their destination requires a car and Timmy must convince his stoner cousin to lend them the use of his vehicle. Worse yet, they need a super-powerful telephoto lens, so David dupes the president of the school photography club, the hot young filly Ellen (Katie Chang), to gain access to the dark room where he steals the group's lens. When Ellen figures out what David's done, she tracks him down, though upon learning what they need the lens for, she insists on tagging along. The boys are cool with this. She's a babe and if she enjoys the journey, maybe she'll join their club so they don't lose their official status at school.

From here on in, many shenanigans ensue, love casts a spell, loyalties are tested, familial peace must be restored and a duck thought to be extinct must be found. Lord knows, I don't want to give this away, but I'm happy to report that this is an engaging family film that kids will really enjoy and frankly, so will their parents. A Birder's Guide To Everything has a delightfully fresh backdrop, a nicely written screenplay and the performances of the kids are fresh and natural.

And hey, it's got Sir Ben Kingsley hobbling around as a peg-leg birder. What more could any parent looking for suitable viewing material for their kids possibly want? This is one sweet, loving and often lovely little movie.

A Birder's Guide To Everything is available on DVD via levelFILM. The DVD has a solid commentary with Meyer and Matheny, the requisite behind the scenes stuff, and a really fun extra that presents a wealth of info on, I'm not kidding, bird calls. Kids of ALL AGES (including adults) will love this one. Feel free to order your copy directly from the links below and in so doing, contribute to the ongoing maintenance of The Film Corner.

Thứ Ba, 1 tháng 4, 2014

ICE SOLDIERS - Review By Greg Klymkiw - Dreadful Canadian 80s Throwback to Straight-to-VHS Action Films

"I'm not quite as stupid as I look. The people who made this movie and gave me a nice fat paycheque are far more stupid than I could ever be.
Ice Soldiers (2013) 1 Pubic Hair - Second Lowest Rating
Dir. Sturla Gunnarson, Starring: Dominic Purcell, Adam Beach, Michael Ironside, Gabriel Hogan

Review By Greg Klymkiw

The Cuban Missile Crisis is in full swing whilst up in the Canadian Arctic, a bunch of Americans at a military outpost go out onto the Tundra to investigate a mysterious crash. Here they find three gentlemen with identical blonde haircuts who all bear a resemblance to Dolph Lundgren in his prime. They're encased in pods and appear to be dead. The biggest of them (Gabriel Hogan) opens his eyes.

Cut to: The Military outpost. Dolph Lundgren Lookalike #1 (DLL#1) is strapped down in a metal containment area. One of the characters TELLS US how dangerous DLL#1 is. He TELLS US he lost half of his men. He TELLS US they needed to plug several high-power tranquilizers in the Hairless Aryan Beast.

So, a quick question. How then do we know we're watching a Canadian movie? Any thoughts? Give up? Okay, for those dim bulbs out there who can't quite get it, the answer is simple. The movie is set in Canada, with a bunch of Canadian actors playing Americans and there clearly wasn't enough money to actually shoot the spectacular carnage - even though it's the beginning of the movie and you'd probably want to open with a bang, not a whimper. But it's a Canadian movie, so a whimper it will be and instead of seeing the wham-bam, we must be told about it.

Another clue is that the outpost's scientist is a babe-o-licious French gal from La Bell Province. The sultry Quebecois brunette looks sadly upon the blonde, super-ripped, manacled DLL#1 and makes it clear her only interest is his well being. He eyes her lasciviously. Hmmmm.

When the 3 DLLs break free, they kill all the men - quite unspectacularly. After all, this is a Canadian movie pretending to be an American movie and as such, there's no money to deliver-up the goods. Our brunette French gal is spared, but not before being raped off-screen by DLL#1. It has to happen off-screen because - come on, guess! Oh, okay. I'll tell you. It's a Canadian movie and Canadians are far too civilized to put a rape scene up there for all to see. God knows, if they did that, they might also violate the content conditions placed on them to receive taxpayer money to finance a good chunk of the film via tax credits and/or investment.

Up to this point, the movie's pretty much been a washout in the action, suspense and gratuitous rape scene department, but because the film is set during the Cuban Missile Crisis, we get to see the soldiers watching a live telecast of JFK during some of the tenser moments with the threat to America from the Russkies. By default, this old news footage wins a Kewpie Doll for being the most suspenseful stuff thus far.

So, let us flash forward 50 years later. A group of soldiers for hire (led by Michael "What the fuck am I doing in this piece of shit?" Ironside) and a Blonde Babe-o-licious scientist are there on behalf of an oil company to do whatever it is they're supposed to do. They have another mission: to assist Malraux (Dominic Purcell) a beefy, BRUNETTE Dolph Lundgren lookalike SCIENTIST from La Belle Province who is there to search for the bodies of the mysterious DLLs who wiped everyone out in the backstory.

At this woeful point, I did the math and frankly, it was of the 1 + 1 = 2 variety. A mysterious dark haired Dolph Lundgren lookalike scientist with a French surname is really interested in finding the three Blonde Dolph Lundgren lookalikes who murdered everyone on the base 50 years earlier and raped (demurely off-screen) the French woman scientist who was brunette and left alive. Add to the equation, a really stupid piece of dialogue where the Blonde Babe scientist states how young looking Dominic Purcell looks and that she expected someone who was 50 years old and voila! The supposedly shocker ending comes about 20 minutes into the movie. (Oh, and anyone who couldn't figure this out by this point is a moron, so you do not have my sympathy for what you might call a "spoiler".)

Okay, the movie is pretty awful by this point anyway, but any hope it would get better was dashed when I realize that the good guy is the biological son of the main bad guy. And yup, the bad guys are superhuman clones developed by the Russkies during the Cold War with a mission to destroy New York City in a terrorist attack and the good guy is the bastard child of one of them and seeks to stop their deadly mission AND get payback for the rape of his mother.

Oh, I kid you not.

The stupidities don't end there. Purcell eventually finds the bodies of the Lundgren Boys all by his lonesome. He knows damn well who they are, but he has them moved to the outpost to do tests on them just to make sure. Good idea. This gives them a chance to break free, kill everyone (boringly and with no genuine action movie flourish) and head to the nearest town (in the fucking Arctic!!!!?????) to kill everyone, including the strippers (in the fucking Arctic? Just around the corner from Santa's workshop????) and hijack a plane to New York. Why these clowns decided to take a rest in the snow and stay frozen for 50 years instead of continuing their mission in the first place is beyond me.

I guess if they did, there wouldn't be a movie. That, however, wouldn't be the stupidest idea I've heard in awhile since there really is no reason for Ice Soldiers to exist. That this film was made takes the prize for that.

Look, a whole lot of nothing happens in this purported movie until the final confrontation. There are a few poorly directed action scenes, a lot of really stupid dialogue, and more anachronisms and inaccuracies than one would find in the absolute worst Grade Z 50s science fiction films. When the final confrontation comes, it's a washout since the film's director has no idea of how to direct action scenes and, in fairness, probably didn't have the budget for it since, one imagines, a good chunk of that change went into someone else's pocket.

On the plus side, there's some fine outdoor photography by one of Canada's best cinematographers Stephen Reizes. If there'd been something resembling a script and a director, this could have been a decent low-budget action thriller. (His individual shots during the action scenes are fine - what goes on in them and how lamely they're cut is the problem.)

I'm a great actor, but a paycheque
is a paycheque, even if I have to
play a stereotypical Aboriginal
trapper who guides the hero
through an Arctic forest
above the tree line.
I certainly hope the great actor Adam Beach got a good chunk of change for wasting his life doing this picture. He's a breath of fresh air in the last half hour, to be sure, but alas, he is saddled with the role of an offensively stereotypical Aboriginal Cree trapper (in the Arctic!!!!!?????) with a booze problem.

He's also skilled in the ways of the Arctic. Even though there are no trees in the Arctic, he manages to guide Dominic Purcell through a thick forest to find the bad guy.

Our movie draws to a close with Adam Beach setting up a Native funeral pyre as he and Purcell watch the Dolph Lundgren lookalikes burn until Purcell utters the knee-slappingly hilarious lines:

"He was my Father! He raped my Mother!"

These are lines worthy only of a screenwriter who penned dumb dialogue for the real Dolph Lundgren. Oh, mercy me! That's the case. Screenwriter Jonathan Tydor wrote the crappy 1990 Dolph Lundgren movie I Come in Peace.

Oy! Only a Canadian would be pathetic enough to shake the dust off someone like Tydor to write a script for their movie. About the only thing that can really be said in this picture's favour is that it's better than Passchendaele, the worst Canadian movie of all time.

Ice Soldiers is available on Blu-Ray and DVD from levelFilm.

NOW HERE'S THE GOOD NEWS, I HAVE ON OFFER, ONE FREE DVD COPY OF ICE SOLDIERS TO THE FIRST PERSON WHO SENDS IN THEIR ANSWER TO THE FOLLOWING TRIVIA QUESTION. IN ICE SOLDIERS, THERE IS A LAME CROSSING THE ICE FLOE SUSPENSE SCENE. NAME THE DIRECTOR AND TITLE OF THE FAMOUS SILENT MOVIE FROM BIOGRAPH PICTURES THAT HAS SUCH A SCENE AND NAME THE DIRECTOR AND TITLE OF THE RUSSIAN FILM WHICH FEATURES A BATTLE SCENE ON ICE FLOES. SEND YOUR ANSWERS TO klymkiwfilmcornerATyahooDOTca AND IF YOU HAVE THE CORRECT ANSWER FIRST, YOU WILL WIN!!!!

Thứ Bảy, 22 tháng 3, 2014

THE INEVITABLE DEFEAT OF MISTER AND PETE - Review By Greg Klymkiw - After-School Special with Balls

JENNIFER HUDSON
from American Idol to Dreamgirls to Weight Watchers to Junkie-Whore
Is there anything this girl can't do? It doesn't look like it.

Fo' a pimp I be fly!
The Inevitable Defeat of Mister and Pete (2013) Dir. George Tillman Jr. **1/2
Starring: Jennifer Hudson, Skylan Brooks, Ethan Dizon, Jordin Sparks, Anthony Mackie, Adewale Akinnuoye-Agbaje

Review By Greg Klymkiw

If you see this movie, and you probably should, you're basically going to be getting a feature-length ABC Afterschool Special where people say "fuck" a lot (including kids) and where everyone's favourite Dreamgirls songstress Jennifer Hudson shoots smack, turns tricks and abandons her child. This alone might be enough to recommend it. The Inevitable Defeat of Mister and Pete is one strange movie. Though much of it felt "been there, done that", there were enough surprising turns in the reasonably compelling story, a clutch of solid performances (great ones from the kids) and relatively smooth direction from the competent George Tillman Jr. In spite of its attempts to be tough-minded, though, the movie finally chickens out with more than enough improbable spoonfuls of sugar to make the medicine go down that it's hard to take it more seriously than the well-crafted trifle it ultimately is.

So, it's summer time and for inner city kids, the living sure ain't easy. Mister (Brooks) and Mom (Hudson) live in the projects. She's strung out on smack most of the time, but she's a good-hearted junkie-whore and takes in Pete (Dizon), the child of a colleague in the junkie-whore trade who's way more strung out than she is. Mister looks upon Pete as an annoying interloper and this surely gets our hero pretty hot and bothered. He doesn't want to hang out with this tiny Asian sissy pants and he sure doesn't want to share what infinitesimal bit of attention he gets from Mom through her glazed eyes.

You know, though, in movies - not so much in life - things have a way of turning around. It takes a bit of doing, but eventually the lads become friends - especially when their respective Mommas are rounded up in a drug raid and incarcerated. Mister and Pete do, however, have a major dilemma on their hands. If they're nabbed by the authorities, they'll wind up in a juvie detention home, fearing they'll be beaten up, corn-holed and/or killed. This, for me, seemed a fair thing to be afeared of. Besides, it allows the movie to move in on Kore-eda turf and pretend to be the 2004 masterpiece Nobody Knows.

I don't actually condemn the picture for this. Believe me when I say there are worse things a movie can pretend to be similar to. That said, someone like Kore-eda sets the bar for this kind of story pretty high, so it's a bit of a case of kinda close, but no cigar for Tillman's efforts. This is not to suggest the movie is a bad one, though. Non-discriminating fans of this type of story will get their fair share of entertainment value and those of the snobby, discriminating persuasion (I include myself here), will not find the experience overly objectionable.

In fact, the movie enjoyably alternates twixt harrowing and fun as the two kids fend for themselves during this section of the movie. There are also a few disturbing elements that add a bit of oomph to the proceedings, though it's a tiny bit disconcerting that the movie introduces, but doesn't really examine them in more satisfying narrative and/or thematically urgent ways.

Please, Sir. We want our Mommas!
One of the kids, it's discovered, has been suffering repeated sexual abuse, but the effects of this are conveniently brushed-off. There are also mixed messages delivered with the film's treatment of a South Asian store owner who responds angrily, though understandably to Mister's initial attitude and eventually resorts to beating the child publicly in the street. While we can't condone the store owner's actions here, there's perhaps a bit too much ambiguity displayed in the store owner's racist views as well as the film's (only slightly) submerged racist attitude towards the store owner.

Most horrendously, the character of a pimp (Anthony Mackie) is also fraught with similar flawed ambiguity. The guy is portrayed a bit too Jekyll-and-Hyde-like for comfort. One one hand, we see a nasty, violent, exploitative and dangerous piece of filth, on the the other he seems like a relatively intelligent and reasonable fella, but then he comes across as a coward who's not going to go the distance when and where it really counts.

If anything, the most egregious element at play is the pat fairytale summation of several story elements that have delivered a great deal of conflict, but upon being tied up ever-so neatly, none of them feel especially earned by the characters. The film's final third congeals into a treacle of feel-good (that some will no doubt welcome), but for me, the shoehorning of oh-so-happy bows and ribbons to placate the audience seems disingenuous to the characters, situations and yes, even the reality the film purports to reflect.

The film ultimately has many worthwhile elements to recommend it, but it does leave one with the overwhelming feeling that it was striving for a kind of greatness it might well have been able to achieve if it had placed far more courage in the convictions of telling this tale.

"The Inevitable Defeat of Mister and Pete" is available on DVD via levelFilm and I recommend purchasing it if this kind of story is up your alley, but the extra features on the DVD alone offer considerable insight into how this film COULD have been great. Even the telling deleted scenes suggest a movie its makers considered far darker than what they wound up with. All this proves is that dampening darkness has resulted in a fencepost experience that didn't really do theatrical business anyway. When will filmmakers, studios, financiers and distributors realize that the best movies need to be true to their inherent ideals. They probably stand a better chance of acceptance into the theatrical marketplace, or at worst, they die on the vine, but attract a much wider, more discriminating (or in many cases, non-discriminating) audience in the home marketplace."

Thứ Bảy, 8 tháng 3, 2014

THE BANSHEE CHAPTER - DVD Review By Greg Klymkiw - Prepare to crap your pants when you see this movie!

THE BANSHEE CHAPTER is now available on DVD from levelFILM and guess what? I have finally succumbed to running movie giveaways on my site. Thanks to the fine folks at District PR, someone finally offered a title I not only love, but feel strongly enough about running a giveaway contest here at The Film Corner. THE FULL DETAILS on the contest are below. Hint: You'll need to actually read the review and do some work to win, but it'll be worth your while if you do. The DVD itself is a gorgeous transfer of a super-creepy, crap-your-pants sci-fi-horror-film and having just watched the DVD, I can declare unequivocally that the movie held up magnificently on a second viewing. I enjoyed it so much, I'll definitely partake of subsequent viewings.

THE BANSHEE CHAPTER won Film Corner accolades of the highest order. It was one of my TOP PICKS at Adam Lopez's 2013 Toronto After Dark Film Festival and also secured a spot on the Film Corner's TEN BEST HORROR FILMS OF 2013 list.

Without further delay, here's the review, and don't forget to play the skill-testing Trivia Challenge down below to WIN you very own FREE DVD copy of THE BANSHEE CHAPTER.

Synopsis:

A journalist (Katia Winter) searches for an old college chum (Michael McMillian) who disappears after experimenting with the same mind altering drugs actually used in secret experiments conducted by the American government during the 50s and 60s. She teams up with an irascible alcoholic druggie (Ted Levine) who is modelled - not at all loosely - upon the late "Fear and Loathing" author Hunter S. Thompson. What they discover is far more horrifying than anything, anyone could ever possibly imagine.
Babe-o-licious star Katia Winter displays
her exquisitely large mouth
designed especially for
SCREAMING!!!!!
The Banshee Chapter (2013)
Dir. Blair Erickson ***1/2
Starring: Katia Winter, Ted Levine

Review By Greg Klymkiw

On a level of pure visceral horror, The Banshee Chapter could be the most terrifying movie of the past decade. This relentlessly intense first feature by writer-director Blair Erickson creeps about with a slow burn, mounting steadily with each passing scene until it begins tossing the tried and true shock cuts when you least expect them. After each and every wham-bam of a cinematic sledge hammer to the face, I found myself literally clutching my chest, gasping for breath and croaking out, repeatedly: "Jesus Christ!" There's absolutely no denying the sheer force and directorial skill on display, however, the shocks are earned by an utterly horrific backdrop.

One of the scariest elements in the movie is the use of "numbers stations" within the context of some supremely creepy story beats. Numbers stations are well known to shortwave enthusiasts as the ultra-ominous broadcasts of code-like messages using a combination of spoken numbers and gibberish - usually uttered by disembodied voices of mostly women or even more hair-raisingly, children. Often assumed to be coded signals from various nations' espionage agencies, conspiracy theorists believe that many of them go well beyond the purview of mere government code and perhaps represent something even more insidious. Given that The Banshee Chapter goes out of its way - not only to scare the crap out of us, but to give us an acute case of the willies, it's safe to say we're treated to some of the most viciously vulpine assaults upon our collective psyches.

Katia Winter discovers something that makes her happy she's wearing "DEPENDS"
There's no two ways about this film's effectiveness as a shocker and that it's also blessed with a phenomenal, delightful and delectably over-the-top rendering of Hunter S. Thompson (let's not kid ourselves) by the legendary Ted (Silence of the Lambs' "Buffalo Bill") Levine. It's also a blessing that we get the super-hot babe Katia Winter delivering a more-than-credible performance as an online journalist who is driven, for once, not so much for the story, but to get at the truth behind the disappearance of a friend, but to also confirm and confront a nagging feeling that her feelings for her pal involve those of unrequited love.

The blasts of radio frequencies, the use of real stock footage and recreated "stick footage" and yes, all the diarrhea-inducing shock cuts combine beautifully to throw us aboard a roller coaster ride of terror we are often begging to be let off of. Everything that contributes to the movie's success as a pure horror film of the highest order are indeed present.

I think it's also important to note that the movie has more shock-cut scares per capita than anything released in years. Some critics might make the mistake of crapping on these as "cheap" scare tactics, but they can just shove their collective heads and snobby noses back up their respective assholes as far as I'm concerned. There's nothing "cheap" about this tactic. In fact, it was a stylistic tool invented by one of the greatest pioneers of horror in cinema history, the legendary chief of the genre division at the old studio R.K.O. Pictures.

The first time this sort of scare ever occurred was in 1942's The Cat People, that wonderful collaboration twixt Lewton, Jacques Tourneur and DeWitt Bodeen. When the shock came in that film, audiences all over the world filled their drawers. Lewton repeated the shock throughout several of his classic films and there was nothing cheap about it because it not only scared people, but was rooted within the whole notion of scaring people with the unknown, the dark and shadows and was also a natural tool within the storytelling itself. (The shock comes during the "walk in the park" sequence and what causes us to jump is what directors and crew - for decades afterwards - would refer to as "The Bus" whenever shots were being set up for eventual use in shock cut sequences. See the movie - most of you probably haven't - and you'll see why all the stalwart old crew hacks called these scenes "The Bus".)

The only time the scare is "cheap" is when there's nothing else in the picture. This is hardly the case with The Banshee Chapter since it pretty much never relies on overt violence or bloodletting, but comes from elements that are not only unique to the narrative, but are perfectly in keeping with the sense of pure paranoia that infuses Erickson's fine picture.

This, I think, however, is why it's a bit disappointing that the consistency in terms of visual storytelling seems somewhat arbitrary. We never are sure what perspective Erickson favours. At times, we feel like we're following a documentary film made by our leading lady, at other times, it feels like someone else's documentary, while yet again, the movie engages in the tropes of "found footage".

Do you really want to know what's being extracted here
and why
and how
it will be used?
Yeah, I thought not.
This lack of consistency might well have been an intentional attempt to always be shifting the perspective, but it's an experiment that usually doesn't pay off successfully because it seldom feels right. Whenever the question of what we're watching crosses our collective minds, we're yanked out of the forward trajectory and forced to regroup. Not that the intent is a bad one - it just doesn't always work and that's a bit of a shame. In retrospect, I have to sadly, if not grudgingly admit that this experiment and/or just plain inconsistent mise-en-scene is what keeps the movie from creeping into what could have been the territory of a pure horror classic. In spite of this, though, the scares are there - they're brutal as all get out - and I have no doubt Erickson will continue to deliver goods of an ever-higher artistic achievement. These are serious quibbles, but they don't take away my faith in his talent or the ultimate quality of the film (and my highest recommendation).

Most importantly, none of this changes the fact that I soiled a pair of pants and boxers that needed to go straight into the laundry after I saw The Banshee Chapter. Next year, I think I might need to attend the Toronto After Dark Film Festival adorned with some "Depends" - kind of like those pathetic gamblers at the casinos.

Hell, maybe distributor levelFILM and/or publicity firm District PR should cut a promotional tie-in with the Depend® brand. I give this idea to both entities - FREE OF CHARGE. Use it!

"The Banshee Chapter" was an Official Selection of the Toronto After Dark Film Festival 2013 and now available on DVD via "levelFILM".

THE GREAT "BANSHEE CHAPTER" FILM CORNER TRIVIA CHALLENGE TO WIN YOUR VERY OWN - FREE - DVD COPY OF "THE BANSHEE CHAPTER"

COURTESY OF: levelFilm, District PR and yours truly at The Film Corner. Here's what you need to do. Each day, for five days, I will add one Trivia Challenge Question related to the film being reviewed. At the end of five days, email all your answers with "BANSHEE" in the subject heading to klymkiwfilmcorner[at]yahoo[dot]ca. The first person to get all five questions right, will win this DVD.

And now, here's Question Number 1:

I refer to the historic innovator of the shock-cut in horror movies by name in the review, but I only refer to this individual by a last name. What is the first and last name of this brilliant head of RKO's horror division?

And now, here's Question #2:

So, you've answered Question 1 and identified the individual who innovated the shock-cut in horror movies and was the head of RKO's horror division. What famous multi-Academy-Award-winning producer did this person mentor and toil under for many years as a script editor, ghost writer, creative consultant and general assistant?

And now, here's Question #3:

Okay, so now you've answered Questions 1 and 2. You now know the name of the man who innovated the horror movie shock-cut we know and love and you've identified the name of the ridiculously famous and brilliant producer our man worked for (before becoming head of RKO's horror division), but now I'm going to really make you work. When our man worked for this famous producer, he was ordered to write up a few scenes depicting the suffering of wounded soldiers. Our man was so angry at the famous producer, he intentionally wrote (uncredited, of course) a scene that was essentially one long shot that was so huge, so expansive, so utterly un-doable and one that would have cost the entire sum of one low budget feature at the time. Our man knew for sure the scene would never be shot. The famous producer, however, was insane and LOVED the idea so much that he DID shoot it and it became one of the most famous shots in movie history. What was the name of this ultra-expensive, wildly popular epic feature that is still the biggest grossing film of all time (adjusted for inflation, of course)?

And now, here's Question #4:

Here's an easy one for you. In The Banshee Chapter, Ted Levine plays a Hunter S. Thompson-like madman. He played another kind of madman in The Silence of the Lambs. What's the name of the character in Jonathan Demme's thriller?

And now, what you've all been clamouring for - Question #5:

What is the full title of the classic fantasy film directed by the legendary low-budget director of the 50s and 60s (immortalized by John Goodman in Joe Dante's Matinee) who was famous for implementing wacky gimmicks in the cinemas showing his horror, sci-fi and fantasy films, but who also, in his final years, directed and produced a series of very serious, highly acclaimed genre pictures that were in the same cutting edge tradition as the new wave of low budget genre films being made now - like The Banshee Chapter? Hint: The full title of our mystery picture includes two "Z" letters.

So email your answers "BANSHEE" in the subject heading to klymkiwfilmcorner[at]yahoo[dot]ca. The first person to get all five questions right, will win the DVD The Banshee Chapter.

In the meantime, here are some fine levelFILM titles you can buy and if you buy 'em by directly clicking on the links below from amazon.ca, amazon.com and amazon.uk then you'll be contributing greatly to the ongoing maintenance of THE FILM CORNER: